«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《国际心血管病杂志》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

期数:

2021年01期

页码:

42-47

栏目:

临床研究

出版日期:

2021-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Clinical value of coronary CT angiography stenosis score in quantitative assessment of ischemic-related lesions

作者:

熊青峰; 付晓荣; 吕丰甫; 郭生鹏

430022 武汉科技大学附属武汉亚洲心脏病医院放射科(熊青峰,吕丰甫,郭生鹏); 430063 武汉科技大学附属武汉市武昌医院儿科(付晓荣)

Author(s):

XIONG Qingfeng¹;  FU Xiaorong²;  LYU Fengfu¹;  GUO Shengpeng¹.

1.Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Asia Heart Hospital of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022; 2. Department of Pediatrics, the Affiliated Wuhan Wuchang Hospital of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430063, Chin

关键词:

冠状动脉疾病;  冠状动脉计算机断层造影;  缺血相关病变;  冠状动脉造影;  血流储备分数

Keywords:

Coronary artery disease;  Coronary computed tomography angiography;  Imaging characteristics;  Ischemic-related lesions;  Coronary angiography;  Fractional flow reserve

分类号:

-

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1673-6583.2021.01.011

文献标识码:

-

摘要:

目的:分析冠状动脉CT血管成像狭窄评分(CCTA-SS)在定量评估缺血相关病变中的临床价值。方法:回顾性分析经冠状动脉CT血管成像(CCTA)诊断为左前降支单支病变的冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(冠心病)疑似患者的临床资料。患者入院1周内接受有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)及血流储备分数(FFR)检查,分析影像特征并计算CCTA-SS,以数值≥70%判断缺血相关病变。以FFR≤0.80评价CCTA、ICA、CCTA-SS诊断缺血相关冠心病的准确性,分析三者受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。临床依据FFR≤0.80行经皮

Abstract:

Objective:To analyze the clinical value of coronary CT angiography(CCTA)stenosis score(CCTA-SS)in quantitative assessment of ischemic-related lesions.Methods:Patients with suspected coronary artery disease(CAD)diagnosed by CCTA, who represented single ves

参考文献/References

[1] Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2014, 129(3):e28-e292.
[2] Siontis GC, Mavridis D, Greenwood JP, et al. Outcomes of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials[J]. BMJ, 2018, 360:k504.
[3] Six AJ, Backus BE, Kelder JC. Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score[J]. Neth Heart J, 2008, 16(6):191-196.
[4] Vergallo R, Xing L, Minami Y, et al. Associations between the Framingham Risk Score and coronary plaque characteristics as assessed by three-vessel optical coherence tomography[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2016, 27(6):460-466.
[5] Lehmann N, Erbel R, Mahabadi AA, et al. Value of progression of coronary artery calcification for risk prediction of coronary and cardiovascular events: result of the HNR study(heinz nixdorf recall)[J]. Circulation, 2018, 137(7):665-679.
[6] Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37(3):267-315.
[7] 熊青峰, 陈艳, 陈险峰, 等. 双源CTA评价非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征[J]. 放射学实践, 2017, 32(1):33-36.
[8] Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M, et al. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012, 5(11):1097-1111.
[9] Wong DT, Ko BS, Cameron JD, et al. Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis a comparison with fractional flow reserve[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 61(12):1271-1279.
[10] Afshar AE, Parikh PB. Prevention of contrast and radiation injury during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med, 2018, 20(4):32.
[11] Koo HJ, Yang DH, Kim YH, et al. CT-based myocardial ischemia evaluation: quantitative angiography, transluminal attenuation gradient, myocardial perfusion, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 32(Suppl 1):1-19.
[12] Donnelly PM, Kolossváry M, Karády J, et al. Experience with an on-site coronary computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve algorithm for the assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2018, 121(1):9-13.
[13] Iwasaki K, Matsumoto T. Myocardial perfusion defect in patients with coronary artery disease demonstrated by 64-multidetector computed tomography at rest[J]. Clin Cardiol, 2011, 34(7):454-460.
[14] Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA,et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME(Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2010,56(3):177-184.
[15] Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1974, 33(1):87-94.
[16] 胡盛寿, 高润霖, 杨跃进, 等. 中国冠状动脉血运重建适宜性标准的建议(试行)[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2016, 31(4):313-317.
[17] Bischoff B, Bamberg F, Marcus R, et al. Optimal timing for first-pass stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 29(2):435-442.
[18] Nakazato R, Otake H, Konishi A, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by CT angiography for identification of high-risk coronary artery lesions: a comparison to optical coherence tomography[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2015, 16(4):373-379.
[19] Takamura K, Fujimoto S, Kondo T, et al. Incremental prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography: high-risk plaque characteristics in asymptomatic patients[J]. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2017, 24(11): 1174-1185.
[20] Dweck MR, Williams MC, Moss AJ, et al. Computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance in ischemic heart disease[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2016, 68(20): 2201-2216.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

基金项目:武汉市卫健委医学项目(WX18C01)
通信作者:付晓荣,E-mail:393450082@qq.com

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-01-20