|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘尚军.经皮冠状动脉介入术后诱发迷走神经反射的危险因素[J].国际心血管病杂志,2018,02:123-126.
　LIU Shangjun.Risk factors of vagus nerve reflex after percutaneous coronary intervention[J].International Journal of Cardiovascular Disease,2018,02:123-126.
点击复制

经皮冠状动脉介入术后诱发迷走神经反射的危险因素

《国际心血管病杂志》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

期数:
2018年02期
页码:
123-126
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2018-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Risk factors of vagus nerve reflex after percutaneous coronary intervention
作者:
刘尚军
572000 三亚,海南省第三人民医院心内科
Author(s):
LIU Shangjun
Department of Cardiology, The Third People's Hospital of Hainan Province, Hainan 57200, China
关键词:
经皮冠状动脉介入;  迷走神经反射;  危险因素;  急救
Keywords:
Percutaneous coronary intervention;  Vagus reflex;  Risk factors;  First aid
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1673-6583.2018.02.015
文献标识码:
-
摘要:
目的:探讨经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)诱发迷走神经反射的危险因素。方法:回顾性分析2010年2月至2017年2月成功行PCI的1 362例患者,比较迷走神经反射组和无迷走神经反射组患者的临床资料,多因素logistic回归分析PCI诱发迷走神经反射的危险因素。结果:纳入研究的1 362例患者中有36例患者发生迷走神经反射,血压下降至(56.38±7.32)/(36.85±7.48)mmHg,心率下降至(45.85±5.65)次/min。迷走神经反射组和无迷走神经反射组患者在既往行经皮冠状动脉介入、留置鞘管、鞘管留置时间、反复穿刺、压迫止血时间、使用桡动脉止血器方面的差异具有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,PCI术后诱发迷走神经反射的危险因素包括鞘管留置时间及压迫止血时间延长。结论:鞘管留置时间及压迫止血时间延长是PCI诱发迷走神经反射的危险因素。
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the risk factors of vagal reflex induced by percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods:The clinical datas of 1 362 patients who underwent PCI during the period from February 2010 to February 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical datas of patients with and without vagus nerve reflex were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factor of PCI-induced vagal reflex.Results:Vagus nerve reflex occurred in 36 patients enrolled in the study. The blood pressure dropped to(56.38±7.32)/(36.85±7.48)mmHg and the heart rate decreased to(45.85±5.65)beats/min. There were significant differences between the patients with and without vagus nerve reflex in past percutaneous coronary intervention, indwelling sheath, the time of sheath indwelling, repeated puncture and compression hemostasis time(all P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors of vagal reflex induced by PCI included the extension of compression hemostasis and the time of sheath indwelling.Conclusions:The time of sheath indwelling and compression hemostasis are risk factors of PCI-induced vagal reflex.

参考文献/References

[1] Speck U, Stolzenburg N, Peters D, et al. How does a drug-coated balloon work? Overview about coating technologies and their impact[J]. J Cardiovasc Surg(Torino), 2015, 57(1):3-11.
[2] Schulz A, Hauschild T, Kleber FX. Treatment of coronary de novo bifurcation lesions with DCB only strategy[J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2014, 103(6):451-456.
[3] Arslan U, Kocaogˇlu I, Balci MM, et al. Monocyte heterogeneity in myocardial infarction with and without ST elevation and its association with angiographic findings[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2013, 24(5):404-411.
[4] Scheller B, Clever YP, Kelsch B, et al. Long-term follow-up after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2012, 5(3):323-330.
[5] Vos NS, van der Schaaf RJ, Amoroso G, et al. Revascularization with paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stenting in acute myocardial infarction—a randomized controlled trial: rationale and design of the revelation trial[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2016, 87(7):1213-1221.
[6] 巫天明. 不同途径经皮冠状动脉介入诊治非心脏并发症的分析[J]. 临床荟萃, 2013, 28(1):61-62.
[7] 李辉, 孙福成, 张慧平, 等. 经皮冠状动脉介入术后脑出血并发症分析[J]. 中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志, 2013, 20(4):250-252.
[8] Sciahbasi A, Mancone M, Cortese B, et al. Transradial percutaneous coronary interventions using sheathless guiding catheters: a multicenter registry[J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2011, 24(5):407-412.
[9] Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C, Cremers B, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: the three-year results of the PEPCAD Ⅱ ISR study[J]. EuroIntervention, 2015, 11(8):926-934.
[10] Siontis GC, Stefanini GG, Mavridis D, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventional strategies for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a network meta-analysis[J]. Lancet, 2015, 386(9994):655-664.
[11] Xu B, Gao R, Wang J, et al. A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of paclitaxel-coated balloon versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis: results from the PEPCAD China ISR trial[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2014, 7(2):204-211.
[12] Kleber FX, Rittger H, Bonaventura K, et al. Drug-coated balloons for treatment of coronary artery disease: updated recommendations from a consensus group[J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2013, 102(11):785-797.
[13] Brancati MF, Burzotta F, Coluccia V, et al. The occurrence of radial artery occlusion following catheterization[J]. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther, 2012, 10(10):1287-1295.
[14] López Mínguez JR, Nogales Asensio JM, Doncel Vecino LJ, et al. A prospective randomised study of the paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in bifurcated coronary lesions(BABILON trial): 24-month clinical and angiographic results[J]. EuroIntervention, 2014, 10(1):50-57.
[15] Li J, Li X, Wang Q, et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China from 2001 to 2011(the China PEACE-Retrospective Acute Myocardial Infarction Study): a retrospective analysis of hospital data[J]. Lancet, 2015, 385(9966):441-451.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-04-20