«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《国际心血管病杂志》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

期数:

2024年03期

页码:

181-185

栏目:

临床研究

出版日期:

2024-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

To compare the early effects of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with different internal mammary arteries

作者:

房磊; 曹向戎; 王丕杉; 金琪琳; 孟祥宽; 王坡

102600 北京，首都医科大学大兴教学医院心脏外科（房磊，王丕杉，金琪琳，孟祥宽，王坡）；100029 首 都医科大学附属北京安贞医院 北京市心肺血管疾病研究所心外科（曹向戎）

Author(s):

FANG Lei¹;  CAO Xiangrong²;  WANG Pishan¹;  JIN Qilin¹;  MENG Xiangkuan¹;  WANG Po¹

1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Capital Medical University Daxing Teaching Hospital，Beijing 102600; 2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical Unwersity, Beijing

关键词:

冠状动脉旁路移植术; 冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病; 乳内动脉

Keywords:

Coronary artery bypass grafting; Coronary atherosclerotic heart disease; Internal mammary artery

分类号:

-

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1673-6583.2024.03.014

文献标识码:

-

摘要:

目的：比较骨骼化乳内动脉（IMA）与带蒂IMA 行不停搏冠状动脉旁路移植术 （OPCABG）后的早期临床效果。 方法：选取2020 年10 月至2022 年4 月首都医科大学大 兴教学医院110 例单纯行胸骨正中切口的OPCABG 患者，搭桥方式均为左侧IMA 与前降支 吻合。其中男性81 例，女性29 例，平均年龄（58.6±8.7）岁。根据术中IMA 获取情况，分 为骨骼化IMA 组（54 例）和带蒂IMA 组（56 例）。比较2 组IMA 获取时间、住院时间、 吻合后血管流速、术后引流量、术后第2

Abstract:

Objective: To compare and analyze the application effect of obtaining skeletonized or pedicled internal mammary artery (IMA) in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). Methods: 110 patients who underwent OPCABG were enrolled in the trialfrom Oc

参考文献/References

[1] Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/ AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2022, 79(2):e21-e129.
[2] Gaudino M, Antoniades C, Benedetto U, et al. Mechanisms, consequences, and prevention of coronary graft failure[J]. Circulation, 2017, 136(18):1749-1764.
[3] Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J]. Eur Heart J, 2019, 40(2):87-165.
[4] Keeley SB. The skeletonized internal mammary artery[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1987, 44(3):324-325.
[5] Nezi? DG, Knezevi? AM, Cirkovi? MV, et al. The dilemma of skeletonized internal thoracic artery sequential bypass versus proximal pedicled in situ internal thoracic artery plus coronarycoronary free internal thoracic artery bypass for multiple lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004, 127(6):1810-1812.
[6] Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44(11):2149-2156.
[7] Shi J, Iesaki T, Kubota NZI, et al. Skeletonization with an ultrasonic scalpel is as safe as a non-skeletonized dissection in preserving the endothelial function of the human gastroepiploic artery[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2009, 8(2):216-220.
[8] Sasajima T, Wu MHD, Shi Q, et al. Effect of skeletonizing dissection on the internal thoracic artery[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1998, 65(4):1009-1013.
[9] Fouquet O, Tariel F, Desulauze P, et al. Does a skeletonized internal thoracic artery give fewer postoperative complications than a pedicled artery for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2015, 20(5):663-668.
[10] Calafiore AM, Vitolla G, Iaco AL, et al. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: midterm results of pedicled versus skeletonized conduits[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1999, 67(6):1637- 1642.
[11] Mannacio V, Di Tommaso L, De Amicis V, et al. Randomized flow capacity comparison of skeletonized and pedicled left internal mammary artery[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2011, 91(1):24- 30.
[12] Benoit MO, Paris M, Silleran J, et al. Cardiac troponin I: its contribution to the diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction and various complications of cardiac surgery[J]. Crit Care Med, 2001, 29(10):1880-1886.
[13] Carrier M, Grégoire J, Tronc F, et al. Effect of internal mammary artery dissection on sternal vascularization[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1992, 53(1):115-119.
[14] Cohen AJ, Lockman J, Lorberboym M, et al. Assessment of sternal vascularity with single photon emission computed tomography after harvesting of the internal thoracic artery[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1999, 118(3):496-502.
[15] Mazur P, Litwinowicz R, Tchantchaleishvili V, et al. Left internal mammary artery skeletonization reduces bleeding—a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2021, 112(3):794-801.
[16] Boodhwani M, Lam BK, Nathan HJ, et al. Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvest reduces pain and dysesthesia and improves sternal perfusion after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized, double-blind, within-patient comparison[J]. Circulation, 2006, 114(8):766-773.
[17] Lamy A, Browne A, Sheth T, et al. Skeletonized vs pedicled internal mammary artery graft harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery: a post Hoc analysis from the COMPASS trial[J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2021, 6(9):1042-1049.
[18] Gaudino M, Audisio K, Rahouma M, et al. Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes of skeletonized vs pedicled internal thoracic artery harvesting techniques in the arterial revascularization trial[J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2021, 6(12):1380-1386.
[19] Dreifaldt M, Samano N, Geijer H, et al. Pedicled versus skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafts: a randomized trial[J]. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, 2021, 29(6):490-497.
[20] Kusu-Orkar TE, Kermali M, Masharani K, et al. Skeletonized or pedicled harvesting of left internal mammary artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 33(1):10-18.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

通信作者：曹向戎，E-mail：15510733568@163.com

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-05-20