索引超出了数组界限。 文章摘要
|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]黄恺辰,杨溢,朱云鹏,等.主动脉瓣病变合并小主动脉瓣环的治疗现状[J].国际心血管病杂志,2023,06:374-378.
点击复制

主动脉瓣病变合并小主动脉瓣环的治疗现状(PDF)

《国际心血管病杂志》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

期数:
2023年06期
页码:
374-378
栏目:
综述
出版日期:
2023-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
-
作者:
黄恺辰杨溢朱云鹏赵强
200025 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院心脏外科
Author(s):
-
关键词:
主动脉瓣病变小主动脉瓣环主动脉瓣置换术主动脉瓣环扩大术
Keywords:
-
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1673-6583.2023.06.010
文献标识码:
-
摘要:
小主动脉瓣环的存在对严重主动脉瓣疾病患者的治疗构成极大的威胁与挑战。 目前针对此类患者的最佳治疗方案仍具争议。该文介绍目前可用于改善主动脉瓣病变合并 小主动脉瓣环的血流动力学和临床预后的治疗策略,包括使用传统外科机械瓣、有支架或无 支架生物瓣、免缝合及快速置入瓣膜、自体或同种异体瓣膜等进行主动脉瓣置换术,主动脉 瓣环扩大术及经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗进展。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References

[1] Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2021, 143(8):e254-e743.
[2] In China TWCOTROCHAD, Hu SS. Report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2021: an updated summary[J]. J Geriatr Cardiol, 2023, 20(6):399-430.
[3] Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2021, 143(5):e35-e71.
[4] Vaidya YP, Cavanaugh SM, Sandhu AA. Surgical aortic valve replacement in small aortic annulus[J]. J Card Surg, 2021, 36(7):2502-2509.
[5] Yashima F, Yamamoto M, Tanaka M, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with an extremely small native aortic annulus: the OCEAN-TAVI registry[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2017, 240:126-131.
[6] Ferrara J, Theron A, Porto A, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in small aortic annuli: self-expandable vs. balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(7):1959.
[7] Freitas-Ferraz AB, Tirado-Conte G, Dagenais F, et al. Aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus[J]. Circulation, 2019, 139(23):2685-2702.
[8] Fallon JM, DeSimone JP, Brennan JM, et al. The incidence and consequence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2018, 106(1):14-22.
[9] Miyasaka M, Tada N, OCEAN-SHD family. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation[J]. Cardiovasc Interv Ther, 2022, 37(4):615-625.
[10] Guimar?es L, Voisine P, Mohammadi S, et al. Valve hemodynamics following transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic annulus[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2020, 125(6):956-963.
[11] Kapetanakis EI, Athanasiou T, Mestres CA, et al. Aortic valve replacement: is there an implant size variation across Europe?[J]. J Heart Valve Dis, 2008, 17(2):200-205.
[12] Nakamura H, Yamaguchi H, Takagaki M, et al. Rigorous patient-prosthesis matching of Perimount Magna aortic bioprosthesis[J]. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, 2015, 23(3):261-266.
[13] Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch[J]. Circulation, 1978, 58(1):20-24.
[14] Joury A, Duran A, Stewart M, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch following aortic and mitral valves replacement—a comprehensive review[J]. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2022, 72:84- 92.
[15] Feier H, Grigorescu A, Falnita L, et al. Long-term results (up to 20 years) of 19 mm or smaller prostheses in the aortic position. Does size matter? A propensity-matched survival analysis[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(10):2055.
[16] Garatti A, Mori F, Innocente F, et al. Aortic valve replacement with 17-mm mechanical prostheses: is patient-prosthesis mismatch a relevant phenomenon?[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2011, 91(1):71-77.
[17] Kato Y, Hattori K, Motoki M, et al. Optimal results of aortic valve replacement with small mechanical valves (< 19 mm) [J]. J Heart Valve Dis, 2013, 22(4):468-475.
[18] Mizoguchi H, Sakaki M, Inoue K, et al. Mid-term results of small-sized St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic valves (21 mm or less) for small aortic annulus[J]. Heart Vessels, 2013, 28(6):769-774.
[19] Kobayashi Y, Fukushima Y, Hayase T, et al. Clinical outcome of aortic valve replacement with 16-mm ATS-advanced performance valve for small aortic annulus[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010, 89(4):1195-1199.
[20] Hu J, Qian H, Li YJ, et al. Seventeen-millimeter St. Jude Medical Regent valve in patients with small aortic annulus: dose moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch matter?[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2014, 9:17.
[21] Berreklouw E, Vogel B, Fischer H, et al. Fast sutureless implantation of mechanical aortic valve prostheses using Nitinol attachment rings: feasibility in acute pig experiments[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2007, 134(6):1508- 1512.
[22] Kim SH, Kim HJ, Kim JB, et al. Supra-annular versus intraannular prostheses in aortic valve replacement: impact on haemodynamics and clinical outcomes[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2019, 28(1):58-64.
[23] Ugur M, Suri RM, Daly RC, et al. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 148(5):1940-1946.
[24] Tavakoli R, Danial P, Oudjana AH, et al. Biological aortic valve replacement: advantages and optimal indications of stentless compared to stented valve substitutes. A review[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 66(5):247-256.
[25] Yang B, Makkinejad A, Fukuhara S, et al. Stentless versus stented aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2022, 114(3):728-734.
[26] Zubarevich A, Szczechowicz M, Amanov L, et al. Noninferiority of sutureless aortic valve replacement in the TAVR era: David versus Goliath[J]. Life(Basel), 2022, 12(7):979.
[27] Borger MA, Dohmen PM, Knosalla C, et al. Haemodynamic benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via a minimally invasive approach: 1-year results of a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2016, 50(4):713-720.
[28] Chiariello GA, Bruno P, Villa E, et al. Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with small aortic annulus: results with three different bioprostheses[J]. Innovations(Phila), 2019, 14(1):27- 36.
[29] Salmasi MY, Ramaraju S, Haq I, et al. Rapid deployment technology versus conventional sutured bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement[J]. J Card Surg, 2022, 37(3):640-655.
[30] D'Onofrio A, Salizzoni S, Rubino AS, et al. The rise of new technologies for aortic valve stenosis: a comparison of sutureless and transcatheter aortic valve implantation[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2016, 152(1):99-109.e2.
[31] de Varennes B, Lachapelle K, Cecere R, et al. North American single-center experience with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2016, 151(3):735- 742.
[32] Sohn SH, Jang MJ, Hwang HY, et al. Rapid deployment or sutureless versus conventional bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 155(6):2402-2412.e5.
[33] Al-Maisary S, Farag M, Te Gussinklo WH, et al. Are sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valves a serious alternative to TA-TAVI? A matched-pairs analysis[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(14):3072.
[34] Galeone A, Trojan D, Gardellini J, et al. Cryopreserved aortic homografts for complex aortic valve or root endocarditis: a 28-year experience[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2022, 62(3):ezac193.
[35] Nappi F, Iervolino A, Avtaar Singh SS. The effectiveness and safety of pulmonary autograft as living tissue in Ross procedure: a systematic review[J]. Transl Pediatr, 2022, 11(2):280-297.
[36] Bortolotti U, Celiento M, Milano AD. Enlargement of the aortic annulus during aortic valve replacement: a review[J]. J Heart Valve Dis, 2014, 23(1):31-39.
[37] Sá MPBO, Zhigalov K, Cavalcanti LRP, et al. Impact of aortic annulus enlargement on the outcomes of aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis[J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 33(2):316-325.
[38] Rocha RV, Manlhiot C, Feindel CM, et al. Surgical enlargement of the aortic root does not increase the operative risk of aortic valve replacement[J]. Circulation, 2018, 137(15):1585-1594.
[39] Okamoto Y, Yamamoto K, Sugimoto T, et al. Early and late outcomes of aortic valve replacement with aortic annular enlargement: a propensity analysis[J]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2016, 64(5):410-417.
[40] Hase H, Yoshijima N, Yanagisawa R, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with Evolut R versus Sapien 3 in Japanese patients with a small aortic annulus: the OCEANTAVI registry[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2021, 97(6):E875-E886.
[41] Pivato CA, Cao D, Spirito A, et al. Impact of small valve size on 1-year outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in women (from the WIN-TAVI registry)[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2022, 172:73-80.
[42] Voigtl?nder L, Kim WK, Mauri V, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with a small aortic annulus: performance of supra-, intra- and infra-annular transcatheter heart valves[J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2021, 110(12):1957-1966.
[43] Rodés-Cabau J, Pibarot P, Suri RM, et al. Impact of aortic annulus size on valve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER Trial[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2014, 7(5):701-711.
[44] Nishigawa K, Onga Y, Uemura K, et al. Surgical aortic valve replacement provides better left ventricular mass regression than transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic annulus[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2023, 71(3):167-174.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:上海市卫生健康委员会科研项目(20234Y0081)
通信作者:赵强, E-mail:zq11607@rjh.com.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-11-20