«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《国际心血管病杂志》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

期数:

2023年04期

页码:

242-246

栏目:

临床研究

出版日期:

2023-07-30

文章信息/Info

Title:

Left ventricular global longitudinal strain in HFpEF patients after STEMI with left antrior descending artery occlusion?

作者:

王鹏; 马英杰; 李彬; 王建; 田静; 王强; 苏国海

250118 济南，山东第一医科大学附属中心医院心血管内科（王鹏，马英杰，田静，王强，李彬，苏国海），放射科（王建）通信作者：苏国海， E-mail：gttstg@163.com

Author(s):

WANG Peng; MA Yingjie; LI Bin; WANG Jian; TIAN Jing; WANG Qiang; SU Guohai

Department of Cardiology, Central Hospital Affiliated to ShandongFirst Medical University, Jinan 250118

关键词:

ST段抬高心肌梗死; 射血分数保留的心力衰竭; 心脏磁共振; 左心室整体纵向应变

Keywords:

ST-elevation myocardial infarction;  Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction;  Cardiac magnetic resonance;  Left ventricular global longitudinal strain

分类号:

-

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1673-6583.2023.04.012

文献标识码:

-

摘要:

目的：研究靶血管为前降支（LAD）的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死（STEMI）后射血分数保留的心力衰竭（HFpEF）患者的左心室整体纵向应变（GLS）与分节段纵向应变之间的关系。方法：选取山东第一医科大学附属中心医院2019年至2022年接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）的21例急性STEMI，且靶血管为LAD的HFpEF患者（超声心动图显示左室射血分数≥50%），设为STEMI组。对照组为21名同期接受心脏磁共振（CMR）检查的健康人群。比较2组间CMR特征、左心室GLS与分节段纵向应变之间的相关性。结果

Abstract:

Objective：To investigate the relationship between global longitudinal strain (GLS) of the left ventricle and segmental longitudinal strain (SLS) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with preserved ejection fraction and left anter

参考文献/References

[1]Reed GW, Rossi JE, Cannon CP. Acute myocardial infarction[J]. Lancet, 2017, 389(10065):197-210.
[2]Frank M, Sanders C, Berry BP. Evaluation and management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department[J]. Emerg Med Pract, 2021, 23(1):1-28.
[3] 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告》编写组, 王增武, 胡盛寿.《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021》要点解读[J].中国心血管杂志, 2022, 27(4):305-318.
[4]Curtis JP, Sokol SI, Wang YF, et al. The association of left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality, and cause of death in stable outpatients with heart failure[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003, 42(4):736-742.
[5]Wang Q, Wang J, Ma YJ, et al. Predictive value of myocardial strain on myocardial infarction size by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13:1015390.
[6]Kalam K, Otahal P, Marwick TH. Prognostic implications of global LV dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global longitudinal strain and ejection fraction[J]. Heart, 2014, 100(21):1673-1680.
[7]Aikawa T, Kariya T, Yamada KP, et al. Impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain is associated with elevated left ventricular filling pressure after myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2020, 319(6):H1474-H1481.
[8]Badano LP, Muraru D, Ciambellotti F, et al. Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography[J]. Echocardiography, 2020, 37(11):1951-1956.
[9]Stanton T, Leano R, Marwick TH. Prediction of all-cause mortality from global longitudinal speckle strain: comparison with ejection fraction and wall motion scoring[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009, 2(5):356-364.
[10] Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2018, 39(2):119-177.
[11] Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2002, 105(4):539-542.
[12] Naing P, Forrester D, Kangaharan N, et al. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a growing global epidemic[J]. Aust J Gen Pract, 2019, 48(7):465-471.
[13] Ortiz-Pérez JT, Rodríguez J, Meyers SN, et al. Correspondence between the 17-segment model and coronary arterial anatomy using contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2008, 1(3):282-293.
[14] Setser RM, O'Donnell TP, Smedira NG, et al. Coregistered MR imaging myocardial viability maps and multi-detector row CT coronary angiography displays for surgical revascularization planning: initial experience[J]. Radiology, 2005, 237(2):465-473.
[15] Backhaus SJ, Kowallick JT, Stiermaier T, et al. Culprit vessel-related myocardial mechanics and prognostic implications following acute myocardial infarction[J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2020, 109(3):339-349.
[16] Park SM, Hong SJ, Kim YH, et al. Predicting myocardial functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction:relationship between myocardial strain and coronary flow reserve[J]. Korean Circ J, 2010, 40(12):639-644.[17] Rongchao C, Guoqian W, Longhao Y, et al. GW25-e0278 coronary flow reserve in the remote myocardium predict left ventricular remodeling following acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014, 64(16):C138.
[18] Figueras J, Otaegui I, Marti G, et al. Area at risk and collateral circulation in a first acute myocardial infarction with occluded culprit artery. STEMI vs non-STEMI patients[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2018, 259:14-19.
[19] Seiler C, Stoller M, Pitt B, et al. The human coronary collateral circulation: development and clinical importance[J]. Eur Heart J, 2013, 34(34):2674-2682.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

基金项目：中国博士后科学基金（2020M682119）；山东省自然科学基金（ZR2020MH026，ZR2021MG019）；山东省博士后创新项目（202102041）；济南市临床医学科技创新计划（202019045）
（收稿：2022-12-28 修回：2023-03-22）

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-08-01