«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《国际心血管病杂志》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

期数:

2020年02期

页码:

113-117

栏目:

临床研究

出版日期:

2020-03-29

文章信息/Info

Title:

Predictive value of intrinsicoid deflection in reactivity after cardiac resynchronization therapy

作者:

余飞 姚亚丽 马正科 李明明

730070 兰州大学第一医院心脏中心

Author(s):

YU Fei;  YAO Yali;  MA Zhengke;  LI Mingming

Heart Centre, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Gansu 730000, China

关键词:

慢性心力衰竭;  心脏再同步化治疗;  类本位曲折;  治疗反应

Keywords:

Chronic heart failure;  Cardiac resynchronization therapy;  Intrinsicoid deflection;  Response

分类号:

-

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1673-6583.2020.02.012

文献标识码:

-

摘要:

目的:探讨代表心室激动时间延迟的类本位曲折间期对心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)反应性的预测价值。方法:连续入选兰州大学第一医院心脏中心2009年12月至2018年2月收治的71例成功植入CRT的心力衰竭患者,收集患者基线资料、体表心电图及超声心动图指标。根据患者术后6个月左室收缩末期容积较术前降低≥15%,将患者分为CRT有反应组(n=47)和CRT无反应组(n=24),比较两组患者临床资料,采用logistic回归分析类本位曲折间期对CRT反应性的预测价值,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线判断预测CRT有反应的最佳截断值截。结果:成功植入CRT的慢性心力衰竭患者中男性居多,扩张性心肌病是最常见的病因。CRT有反应组QRS缩短值(ΔQRSd)、术前及术后6个月射血分数的改变值(ΔLVEF)、术前V₅导联类本位曲折间期(ID_V5)和V₆导联类本位曲折间期(ID_V6)均大于CRT无反应组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。Logistic回归分析发现ΔLVEF(OR=1.07,95%CI:1.01～1.13,P=0.02)、ΔQRSd(OR=1.13,95%CI:1.07～1.19,P均<0.01)、术前ID_V5(OR=1.11,95%CI:1.05～1.18,P均<0.01)和ID_V6(OR=1.04,95%CI:1.01～1.07,P均<0.01)与CRT反应有相关性。ROC曲线示当ID_V5为71 ms时,约登指数最大为0.390,ROC曲线下面积为0.791(95%CI:0.685～0.900,P均<0.01); 当ID_V6为79 ms时,约登指数最大为0.459,ROC曲线下面积为0.740(95%CI:0.599～0.880, P均<0.01)。结论:左室侧壁类本位曲折间期对CRT反应性具有预测价值,结合ΔQRSd值可进一步提高对CRT反应性的预测价值。

Abstract:

Objective:To explore the value of intrinsicoid deflection(ID)time, which represents delayed ventricular activation, in predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT).Methods:A total of 71 consecutive patients with chronic heart failure receiving CRT in the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from December 2009 to February 2018 were included. Baseline data, surface electrocardiogram and echocardiography paraments of all the patients were collected. According to the changes of left ventricular end systolic volume(LVESV)at 6 months after operation, the patients were divided into two groups, namely response group(n=47), in which LVESV decreased 15% and above, and non-response group(n=24). The clinical characteristics of the two groups were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to reveal whether ID time had predictive value for CRT response or not, and the best cutoff point for predicting response was judged by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.Results:Most of the patients with CRT implantation was male, and dilated cardiomyopathy was the most common cause. Compared with the non-response group, the preoperative ID time in lead V₅(ID_V5)and V₆(ID_V6)in response group was longer, with more QRS decrease(ΔQRSd)and changes of ejection fraction(ΔLVEF)before and 6 months after operation(all P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that ΔLVEF(OR=1.07, 95%CI 1.01-1.13, P=0.02), ΔQRSd(OR=1.13, 95%CI 1.07-1.19, P<0.01), ID_V5(OR=1.11, 95%CI 1.05-1.08, P<0.01)and ID_V6(OR=1.04, 95%CI 1.01-1.07, P<0.01)were correlated to CRT response. Accoreding to ROC curve, when ID_V5 was 71 ms the Youden index was the largest(0.390)and the area under the ROC curve was 0.791(95%CI 0.685-0.900, P<0.01). When ID_V6 was 79 ms the Youden index was the largest(0.459)and the area under the ROC curve was 0.740(95%CI 0.599-0.880, P<0.01).Conclusions:The ID time has good predictive value for CRT response. Combining with ΔQRSd value can improve the predictive accuracy.

参考文献/References

[ 1 ] Zweerink A, Allaart CP, Kuijer JPA, et al. Strain analysis in CRT candidates using the novel segment length in cine(SLICE)post-processing technique on standard CMR cine images[J]. Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(12):5158-5168.
[ 2 ] Russell K, Eriksen M, Aaberge L, et al. Assessment of wasted myocardial work: a novel method to quantify energy loss due to uncoordinated left ventricular contractions[J]. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2013, 305(7):H996-H1003.
[ 3 ] Prinzen FW, Vernooy K, De Boeck BW, et al. Mechano-energetics of the asynchronous and resynchronized heart[J]. Heart Fail Rev, 2011, 16(3):215-224.
[ 4 ] Heart Failure Society of America, Lindenfeld J, Albert NM, et al. HFSA 2010 comprehensive heart failure practice guideline[J]. J Card Fail, 2010, 16(6):e1-e194.
[ 5 ] Martens P, Nijst P, Verbrugge FH, et al. Profound differences in prognostic impact of left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy relate to heart failure etiology[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2018, 15(1):130-136.
[ 6 ] Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart failure society of Amer[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 70(6):776-803.
[ 7 ] Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the hear Failure Assocition(HFA)of the ESC[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2016, 18(8):891-975.
[ 8 ] Mcmurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Assciotion(HFA)of the ESC[J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33(14):1787-1847.
[ 9 ] Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, Marwick TH, et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44(9):1834-1840.
[10] Del-Carpio Munoz F, Powell BD, Cha YM, et al. Delayed intrinsicoid deflection onset in surface ECG lateral leads predicts left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2013, 10(7): 979-987.
[11] 刘元生. 类本位曲折[J]. 临床心电学杂志, 2013, 22(5):395.
[12] Gold MR, Birgersdotter-Green U, Singh JP, et al. The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy[J]. Eur Heart J, 2011, 32(20):2516-2524.
[13] 郭继鸿. 左束支阻滞性心肌病[J]. 临床心电学杂志, 2013, 22(4):299-308.
[14] Park CS, Cha MJ, Choi EK, et al. Prognostic implication of the QRS axis and its association with myocardial scarring in patients with left bundle branch block[J]. Korean Circ J, 2017, 47(2):263-269.
[15] Van't Sant J, Mast TP, Bos MM, et al. Echo response and clinical outcome in CRT patients[J]. Neth Heart J, 2016, 24(1):47-55.
[16] Sweeney MO, Van Bommel RJ, Schalij MJ, et al. Analysis of ventricular activation using surface electrocardiography to predict left ventricular reverse volumetric remodeling during cardiac resynchronization therapy[J]. Circulation, 2010, 121(5):626-634.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

作者单位:730070 兰州大学第一医院心脏中心
通信作者:姚亚丽,E-mail:yaoyalifs@163.com

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-30