索引超出了数组界限。 文章摘要
|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]袁圆 张奇.定量血流分数的临床研究及应用进展[J].国际心血管病杂志,2020,01:19-22.
点击复制

定量血流分数的临床研究及应用进展(PDF)

《国际心血管病杂志》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

期数:
2020年01期
页码:
19-22
栏目:
综述
出版日期:
2020-01-14

文章信息/Info

Title:
-
作者:
袁圆 张奇
200120上海,同济大学附属东方医院心脏内科
Author(s):
-
关键词:
冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病;  冠状动脉造影;  血流储备分数;  定量血流分数
Keywords:
-
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1673-6583.2020.01.005
文献标识码:
-
摘要:
近年来,冠状动脉(冠脉)功能学评估指导下的经皮冠脉介入术(PCI)越来越受到重视,并已纳入多项指南。冠脉血流储备分数(FFR)作为评估冠脉病变生理学意义的金标准,有一定的局限性。新型无创的冠脉生理学功能性评估方法——定量血流分数(QFR)的出现和应用弥补了FFR的一些不足。该文主要介绍QFR的测定原理、相关临床研究及应用进展。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References

[ 1 ]Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2016, 67(10):1235-1250.
[ 2 ]Boden WE, O'rourke RA, Teo KK, et. al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 356(15):1503-1516.
[ 3 ]中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组, 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会血栓防治专业委员会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(2016)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2016, 44(5):382-400.
[ 4 ]Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J]. Eur Heart J, 2019, 40(2):87-165.
[ 5 ]Pijls NH, Van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis—5-year follow-up of the DEFER study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 49(21):2105-2111.
[ 6 ]Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractiona flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(3):213-224.
[ 7 ]De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 371(13):1208-1217.
[ 8 ]Van De Hoef TP, Meuwissen M, Escaned J, et al. Fractional flow reserve as a surrogate for inducible myocardial ischaemia[J]. Nat Rev Cardiol, 2013, 10(8):439-452.
[ 9 ]Pijls NJ, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses[J]. N Engl J Med, 1996, 334(26):1703-1708.
[10]Lotfi A, Jeremias A, Fearon WF, et al. Expert consensus statement on the use of fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography: a consensus statement of the society of cardiovascular angiography and interventions[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2014, 83(4):509-518.
[11]Melikian N, De Bondt P, Tonino P, et al. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 3(3):307-314.
[12]De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(11):991-1001.
[13]Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, et al. Use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 376(19):1824-1834.
[14]Cesaro A, Gragnano F, Di Girolamo D, et al. Functional assessment of coronary stenosis: an overview of available techniques. Is quantitative flow ratio a step to the future?[J]. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther, 2018, 16(12):951-962.
[15]Tu SX, Westra J, Yang JQ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography the international multicenter FAVOR pilot study[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2016, 9(19):2024-2035.
[16]Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for online assessment of coronary stenosis[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 70(25):3077-3087.
[17]Westra J, Andersen BK, Campo G, et al. Diagnostic performance of in-procedure angiography-derived quantitative flow reserve compared to pressure-derived fractional flow reserve: the FAVOR Ⅱ Europe-Japan study[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2018, 7(14):e29980523.
[18]Westra J, Tu S, Winther S, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery stenosis by quantitative flow ratio during invasive coronary angiography: the WIFI Ⅱ study(Wire-free functional imaging Ⅱ)[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2018, 11(3):e007107.
[19]Westra J, Tu S, Campo G, et al. Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in prospectively enrolled patients: an individual patient-data meta-analysis[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2019, 94(5):693-701.
[20]Smit JM, Koning G, Van Rosendael AR, et al. Relationship between coronary contrast-flow quantitative flow ratio and myocardial ischemia assessed by SPECT MPI[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2017, 44(11):1888-1896.
[21]Emori H, Kubo T, Kameyama T, et al. Quantitative flow ratio and instantaneous wave-free ratio for the assessment of the functional severity of intermediate coronary artery stenosis[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2018, 29(8):611-617.
[22]Spitaleri G, Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, et al. Quantitative flow ratio identifies nonculprit coronary lesions requiring revascularization in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2018, 11(2):e006023.
[23]Asano T, Katagiri Y, Chang CC, et al. Angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in the SYNTAX Ⅱ trial: feasibility, diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio, and clinical prognostic value of functional SYNTAX score derived from quantitative flow ratio in patients with 3-vessel disease[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2019, 12(3):259-270.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(8187002); 浦东新区卫生系统学科带头人培养计划(PWRd2018-06)
作者单位:200120上海,同济大学附属东方医院心脏内科
通信作者:张奇,E-mail:zhangqnh@hotmail.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-01-15