«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《国际心血管病杂志》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

期数:

2019年01期

页码:

52-55

栏目:

临床研究

出版日期:

2019-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

The retrospective analysis of in-hospital mortality and risk factors for patients aged over 80 years with acute myocardial infarction

作者:

赵健 贺治青 张艳达 梁春

200003 上海,第二军医大学长征医院心血管内科

Author(s):

ZHAO Jian;  HE Zhiqing;  ZHANG Yanda;  LIANG Chun

Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China

关键词:

老年人; 80岁以上;  急性心肌梗死;  院内死亡

Keywords:

Old; 80 over;  Myocardial infarction;  In-hospital mortality

分类号:

-

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1673-6583.2019.01.012

文献标识码:

-

摘要:

目的:探讨80岁以上急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者院内生存情况及危险因素。方法:连续纳入2012年1月至2017年12月心血管内科收治的80岁以上的138例AMI患者,分析该人群的一般状况、病史、实验室检查、诊断、治疗、院内生存情况及相关危险因素。结果:患者平均年龄为(84.97±3.52)岁; 非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)占73.19%,ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)占26.81%; 53例(38.41%)行经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI),其余接受药物保守治疗,NSTEMI患者选择药物保守治疗的比例显著高于STEMI患者(P<0.001)。33例住院期间死亡,院内病死率呈逐年下降趋势。根据患者院内存活情况,将患者分为院内死亡组(n=33)和院内存活组(n=105),院内死亡组STEMI比例、Killip分级≥3级比例、中性粒细胞数、N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平显著高于院内存活组,而PCI治疗比例则显著低于院内存活组(P均<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析发现,Killip分级≥3级(OR=3.038,P=0.009)和STEMI(OR=6.854,P=0.002)是80岁以上AMI患者院内死亡的独立危险因素,而PCI治疗是其保护因素(OR=0.060,P<0.001)。结论:80岁以上AMI患者NSTEMI占多数,合并症多,PCI治疗率低,院内病死率高,预后较差,AMI严重程度与心功能差是患者院内死亡的重要危险因素,而PCI治疗是其保护因素。

Abstract:

Objective:To investigate the in-hospital mortalities and risk factors of patients aged over 80 years with acute myocardial infarction(AMI).Methods:Clinical data of patients aged over 80 with AMI admitted to the department of cardiology from January 2012 to December 2017 were collected. We performed the analysis of general condition, medical history, laboratory tests, diagnosis, treatment modality and in-hospital mortality in these patients.Results:A total of 138 patients were enrolled, with an average age of(84.97±3.52)years; ST-segment myocardial infarction(STEMI)accounted for 26.81% while Non-ST-segment myocardial infarction(NSTEMI)accounted for 73.19%. Fifty-three patients(38.41%)received percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)and the others received conservative treatment. The proportion of conservative treatment in NSTEMI group was significantly higher than that in STEMI group(P<0.001). Thirty-three patients died during hospitalization, and the in-hospital mortality rate decreased year by year. According to the outcome of patients, they were divided into in-hospital death group and survival group. The rate of Killip≥3, rate of STEMI, levels of neutrophils and NT-proBNP in the death group were significantly higher, while the rate of PCI was lower than those in survival group(all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Killip≥3(OR=3.038,P=0.009)and STEMI(OR=6.854,P=0.002)are the independent risk factors of in-hospital death while PCI is the protective factor(OR=0.060,P<0.001).Conclusions:The majority of AMI patients aged over 80 years have many complications with NSTEMI being more prevalent. PCI treatment rate is low and the prognosis is relatively poor with high in-hospital mortality. Poor cardiac function is an important risk factor for in-hospital mortality and PCI is the protective factor.

参考文献/References

[ 1 ] Perls T. Health and disease in people over 85[J]. BMJ, 2009, 339:b4715.
[ 2 ] Hsieh TH, Wang JD, Tsai LM. Improving in-hospital mortality in elderly patients after acute coronary syndrome—a nationwide analysis of 97,220 patients in Taiwan during 2004-2008[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2012, 155(1):149-154.
[ 3 ] 王辉, 刘震宇, 张抒扬, 等. 高龄急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的近期预后[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2015, 17(10):1028-1032.
[ 4 ] Teng JK, Lin LJ, Tsai LM, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in young and very old Chinese adults: clinical characteristics and therapeutic implications[J]. Int J Cardiol, 1994, 44(1):29-36.
[ 5 ] Koopman C, Bots ML, Van Oeffelen AA, et al. Population trends and inequalities in incidence and short-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction between 1998 and 2007[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2013, 168(2):993-998.
[ 6 ] Claessen BE, Kikkert WJ, Engstrom AE, et al. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction in octogenarians: trends and outcomes[J]. Heart, 2010, 96(11):843-847.
[ 7 ] Skolnick AH, Alexander KP, Chen AY, et al. Characteristics, management, and outcomes of 5,557 patients age > or =90 years with acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE initiative[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 49(17):1790-1797.
[ 8 ] 张云雁, 奥斯曼江·阿斯木, 徐汝明, 等. 高龄急性心肌梗死患者院内生存情况回顾性分析[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2017, 45(6):612-616.
[ 9 ] Sappa R, Grillo MT, Cinquetti M, et al. Short and long-term outcome in very old patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2017, 249:112-118.
[10] Mansencal N, Pilliere R, N'guetta R, et al. Characteristics and prognosis of coronary revascularization procedure in patients age 80 and older presenting with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2010, 16(1):CR15-CR20.
[11] Lee KH, Ahn Y, Kim SS, et al. Characteristics, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of nonagenarian compared with octogenarian acute myocardial infarction patients[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2014, 29(4):527-535.
[12] Khera S, Kolte D, Palaniswamy C, et al. ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the elderly—temporal trends in incidence, utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes in the United States[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2013, 168(4):3683-3690.
[13] Viana-Tejedor A, Loughlin G, Fernández-Avilés F, et al. Temporal trends in the use of reperfusion therapy and outcomes in elderly patients with first ST elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2015, 4(5):461-467.
[14] Caretta G, Passamonti E, Pedroni PN, et al. Outcomes and predictors of mortality among octogenarians and older with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary angioplasty[J]. Clin Cardiol, 2014, 37(9):523-529.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

基金项目:上海市医学领军人才计划(LJRC2015-21)
作者单位:200003 上海,第二军医大学长征医院心血管内科
通信作者:梁春,Email:chunliang@smmu.edu.cn

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-02-25